Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

One of my concerns is that the CDC is not "of the people," i.e., neither elected nor accountable via our congressional representatives. It appears to be representing the interests of the CDC Foundation's donors. The CDC's website says, "The CDC Foundation works with CDC to ensure that programs will have a meaningful impact for CDC and public health…" The list of the Foundation donors reveals a high level of conflict and money flow, and the list of board members reveals the revolving door and possible collusion between big tech, big media, and pharmaceutical companies. I can't swallow the idea that the CDC is a benevolent organization with my best interest in mind.

If I engaged a consulting firm that performed as the CDC has, I would be terminating that contract pronto.

Regarding the situation in California: I am also very concerned about proposed laws that seek to silence doctors who speak out. That is absolutely terrifying!

Expand full comment
Rick's avatar

I would like to add also that the MSM proliferated the issues. Here was an opportunity for the media to be real honest-to-goodness investigative journalists but they chose to be political activists instead. They could have researched on their own and asked the right questions but instead stayed with their liberal agenda. And…the misinformation has remained in the minds of many people and they have unnecessarily changed their day-to-day lives perhaps forever.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts